Christian Republicanism and the Declaration of Independence
Christian Republicanism and the Declaration of Independence
The ideals behind the American Republic have long been associated with the enlightenment. However, this tends to ignore the strong link the to ideas of the Protestant Reformation which contributed much to the discourse of the American Revolution. In fact, many of the founders used Scripture as guide for direction and inspiration. For most Americans of the time the Bible was the cornerstone of their understanding, and the founders would have grown up listening to elders read and relate stories of the from the bible and would have looked to the bible for guidance.[1]
For them the very idea of
Republicanism was linked to their understanding of Christianity, and this can
be seen in the Declaration of Independence, which has become the foundation of
the ideals for the American Republic. In the Declaration, Jefferson writes, and
the founders approved, several references to God; The “Creator,” “Natures’ God,”
and “Supreme Judge of the World.” From the very outset, they linked Christianity
with the founding of the country.
John Quincy Adams, sixth
President of the United States, son of the second President, was witness to
many of these events. As exceptional statesmen and leader himself, made this
view very clear in his speech to the town of Newburyport on July 4th
1837, the 61st anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of independence.
The Fourth of July, of course has long been a celebration of the birth of the
United States and has become a time of reflection for, what is considered by
many to be the foundation of the promise of the United States; the Declaration
of Independence.
From the start of his
oration, John Quincy Adams makes his feelings very clear, “…Why is it that,
next to the birthday of the Savior of the World, your most joyous and most
venerated Festival returns on this day…”[2] Linking Christmas and the
Independence Day, the birth of Jesus with the birth of the United States, Christianity,
and republicanism; for JQA the two are forever linked. He does even further to
say.
“Is it that the
Declaration of independence first organized the social compact on the
foundation of the Redeemers mission upon earth? That it laid the corner stone
of human government upon the first of Christianity, and gave to the world the
first irrevocable pledge of the fulfilment of the prophecies, announced directly
from heaven at the birth of the Savior and predicted by the greatest of the
Hebrew prophets six hundred years before…these fifty five men, on that day,
unanimously adopt and publish to the world a state paper under the title of A
DECLARATION. The object of this Declaration was twofold. First to proclaim the
people of the thirteen United Colonies one people…Secondary to assume in the
name of this one people of the thirteen United Colonies, among the powers of
the Earth, the separate and equal station, to which the Laws: of nature and of
natures’ God, entitled them.”[3]
John Quincy Adams saw the
Declaration as both a statement and a promise, they were proclaiming a God
given right to live by the rules God created. They were also a people united under
Gods guidance, and filling prophecy. The
founders had intentionally and deliberately created a nation with Christ as the
cornerstone and ruled by the laws of God.
[1] Glenn
A Moots, “Revolutionary Spirits: The Enlightened Faith of America’s Founding
Fathers/God of Liberty: A Religious History of the American
Revolution/Liberty’s Exiles: American Loyalists in the Revolutionary
World/Wellspring of Liberty: How Virginia’s Religious Dissenters Helped Win the
American Revolution and Secured Religious Liberty/The First Prejudice:
Religious Tolerance and Intolerance in Early America,” Anglican and
Episcopal History 81, no. 3 (September 2012): 334–339.
[2] John Quincy
Adams, An Oration Delivered before the Inhabitants of the Town of
Newburyport, at Their Request, on the Sixty-First Anniversary of the
Declaration of Independence, July 4th, 1837, Book, Whole (Newburyport
[Mass.], n.d.),.
[3] Ibid,.
Comments
Post a Comment